How They LIED for 60 Years - Eric Kaufmann Exposes the Progressive Myth (#44)
Eric Kaufmann joins Stella O'Malley, Mia Hughes and Dr Bret Alderman to explain why sixty years of progressive ideology are now unravelling across Western institutions. A political scientist who recently left Birkbeck to found the Centre for Heterodox Social Science, Kaufmann offers a sweeping historical account of how ideas born in 1960s Berkeley came to dominate universities, government and media — and why that dominance is now breaking down. This is the long-view conversation that explains not just what is happening in the gender debate, but why.
Eric Kaufmann is not a household name in the gender debate, but he may be one of the most important thinkers for understanding how that debate arrived where it is. A professor of politics, recently departed from Birkbeck College after two decades to found the Centre for Heterodox Social Science, Kaufmann has spent years mapping the ideological forces that captured Western institutions. In this conversation with Stella O'Malley, Mia Hughes and Dr Bret Alderman, he turns that scholarship toward a single urgent question: why is the progressive consensus that has governed the West since the 1960s now visibly coming apart? Kaufmann's starting point is what he calls the moral Big Bang of the 1960s — a rapid, decisive shift in how American institutions understood questions of race, guilt and social obligation. Beginning at Berkeley and accelerating through the civil rights era, a set of ideas about institutional racism and collective culpability spread from campus to government, media, law and eventually into corporate HR departments across the English-speaking world. His argument is that today's culture wars are not a sudden rupture but the logical culmination of policies — affirmative action, disparate impact doctrine, diversity mandates — that have been entrenched for over half a century. One of the more clarifying distinctions in the conversation is Kaufmann's insistence on separating what he calls cultural socialism from economic Marxism. The two share a common vocabulary of oppression and liberation, but they operate through different mechanisms: cultural socialism works through identity categories — race, gender, sexuality — rather than through class and capital. For listeners already sceptical of gender-identity ideology, this framing matters enormously. It explains how a fundamentally ideological project could take root in nominally liberal institutions, from the NHS to university psychology departments, without most people recognising it as an ideological project at all. The dismantling now underway — executive orders, court decisions striking down disparate impact doctrine, the retreat of DEI programmes — is, on Kaufmann's account, not simply a conservative backlash but the correction of a sixty-year overcorrection. He draws a pointed contrast between Canada, which he describes as operating like a kind of progressive theocracy, and the United States and United Kingdom, where the political ground has shifted more dramatically. His own decision to leave Birkbeck and establish a new research centre is itself a small piece of this story: an attempt to create space for the kind of empirical social science that ideological conformity within universities had made increasingly difficult. The hosts press Kaufmann on what this all means going forward. The emerging tension he identifies — between classical liberals who want to restore procedural neutrality and post-liberals on the right who want to use institutional power for their own cultural ends — is precisely the fault line that gender-critical thinkers now have to navigate. Whether the collapse of progressive ideology opens space for honest inquiry or simply replaces one form of capture with another is the unresolved question at the heart of this episode, and it is one the three hosts are well placed to interrogate. The conversation rewards careful listening.
Watch and subscribe on YouTube
Open this episode on the Beyond Gender channel
