Why Did Canada Go Mad? A Conversation with Jonathan Kay
Jonathan Kay — editor, writer and Quillette podcaster — joins Stella, Mia and Bret to map the strange journey Canada has taken over the past five years: from confident liberal democracy to a country gripped by institutional self-condemnation. The conversation is anchored by the May 2021 Kamloops graves claim and radiates outward into media capture, educational ideology and the question of whether Canada is finding its way back. Sharp, funny and unsettling in equal measure.
Canada has a particular relevance for anyone watching gender ideology move through Western institutions. It was among the first countries to enshrine gender identity in law, among the first to offer medical transition to minors as routine care, and among the first to make questioning either of those things a matter of public shame. So when Jonathan Kay — editor, writer and podcaster best known for his work at Quillette — agreed to join the Beyond Gender hosts, it felt like an episode that had been waiting to happen. Kay brings an insider-outsider quality to the conversation. He is unmistakably Canadian — formed by the country, fond of it, alert to its particular character — but he has spent years at Quillette, the publication built around heterodox argument and institutional scepticism. He knows how Canada presents itself to the world and he knows what happens behind that presentation. That dual vision shapes everything he says here. The conversation begins with what Kay calls the Kamloops Grave-rsary: the anniversary of the May 2021 claim that 215 unmarked graves of Indigenous children had been found at a former residential school site. The announcement triggered months of national panic — flag-lowerings, church burnings, cascading public statements, a country performing its own guilt at a volume that left little room for questions. Kay traces how the claim was received, what scrutiny it did and did not receive, and what that episode reveals about the mechanisms by which a society can lose its grip on ordinary epistemic standards. This is not a comfortable conversation, and it is not meant to be. From there the episode opens out. Kay and the hosts move through an Ontario teacher case that crystallised something about where institutional culture had arrived, through the particular darkness that settled over public life in 2021, and into the broader question of how a country goes from confident to self-lacerating in the space of a few years. What makes the conversation work is that Kay is a genuinely funny man, and Stella, Mia and Bret give that register room to breathe. There is real wit here alongside the analysis, which is itself a kind of argument: that honest engagement with difficult material does not require permanent solemnity. The later sections of the episode turn to Canadian television and media — the ways cultural output reflects and reinforces ideological consensus — and then, crucially, to the future. The phrase Elbows Up has become a shorthand for something new stirring in the Canadian public, a counter-pressure against both external pressure and internal ideological capture. Kay is neither simply pessimistic nor naively hopeful; he reads the signals with the care of someone who has been watching closely for a long time. For listeners of Beyond Gender, the value of this episode lies in the pattern recognition it enables. The same institutional dynamics that allowed a contested claim to go effectively unchallenged are the dynamics that have driven gender medicine into schools and paediatric clinics across the Western world. Canada is a case study, not an exception. Listening to Jonathan Kay think out loud about what happened to his country is, among other things, a way of understanding what is happening everywhere.
Watch and subscribe on YouTube
Open this episode on the Beyond Gender channel
